The Brand Man Speaks

Paula Deen may have swallowed her own poison pill. High Fat Food Chef hides Diabetes

Paul Deen the southern chef who rose to prominence in the past few years with her high fat generally unhealthy but delicious (to many-but not me) cuisine has finally disclosed that she has Diabetes. What is worse and threatens to destroy her brand is the fact that she hid this information from her "fans" and the public in general and then has gone on to become a spokesperson for a Diabetes drug called Victoza.

The problem lies in the fact that her claim to fame are foods that are unhealthy and could directly relate to causing Diabetes in those who indulge in such fat-ladden meals. Ms. Deen has said she "didn't know how to handle" disseminating the news of her Diabetes or her new spokesperson status given the nature of her brand's identity.

Famous recipes have included Deep Fried Mac and Cheese and Fried Butter Balls. Can you say "it might kill you" foods?

Fans of the Food Network have spoken loudly condemning Ms. Deen for making millions and not being honest with her fans and the American public in general.  Other notable chefs have gone as far as to make public statements about Ms. Deen that are not complimentary about this situation.

From a brand point of view, this latest twist (which includes now offering low(er) fat recipes and tweaking her famous Paul Deen Southern Cooking approach dramatically) may create empathy but it undercuts what her brand was all about specifically all her cookbooks and shows that are completely tied to fatty foods.

If she radically changes her shows books and endorsements the Paula Deen brand will be no more and likely to become a footnote in celebrity chef history.

Watching out for you everyday.

Eli

Mercedes Benz uses Che Guevara in promotional presentation causing outrage

In a bumbling effort to promote what Mercedes called "revolutionary" new developments in automotive technology the luxury automaker is scrambling to do damage control over the use of marxist revolutionary Che Guevara's image with a Mercedes 3 point star in his beret in a Las Vegas CES presentation this week.

In a rare moment of joining forces, liberal and conservative individuals and groups have cried foul and condemned the automaker for the use and reference. For example:

"Mercedes-Benz Uses Communist Madman Che Guevara to Sell Luxury Cars," said the headline on a blog from the Heritage Foundation, a prominent conservative political organization in Washington.

"Che Guevara... was a psychopath whose sadistic lust for blood was not easily quenched. He killed for pleasure," noted Heritage Vice President Mike Gonzalez.

It blows my mind sometimes how smart marketers do very dumb things without thinking about them. Mercedes has apologized for the use but the PR which is very negative can't be that easily ignored this time because key customer targets are expressing outrage throughout both traditional and social media.

Ernesto Suarez, who organized an effort to get Mercedes to apologize for using the image of a man often  called "a racist, homophobic, anti-semitic and tyrannical killer who admitted in his own writing to his endless blood thirst, " expressed relief that his effort to generate the apology was realized.

Some social media pundits have called for a boycott of Mercedes Benz cars. (Mercedes Benz just completed an oustanding sales year running neck and neck with BMW for top honors in the luxury automotive arena.)

A german automaker like Mercedes has to be very careful doing such polarizing activities because of its association with Hitler's operations during World War II and beliefs among segments of the American population (Conservative and Orthodox Jews for example) that Mercedes along with other German companies will never be cleared of their anti-semitic alliances from the War.

Watching out for you everyday.

Eli

BMW integrates "Ultimate Driving Machine" tag line into brand essence.

BMW has one of the most memorable automotive tag lines, "Ultimate Driving Machine", (created in 1975) and after reducing its use in last few years is integrating it back into the entire brand essence effort.

Few brands of automobiles are as clearly defined as BMW helping the brand be at the top or near the top of luxury car sales worldwide year after year. This past year it was number one.

The concept of the "Ultimate Driving Machine" has given BMW a distinctive positioning that has been meaningful to consumers in a way other luxury cars have not. Volvo's long gone positioning of safety was another extremely connective brand positioning but none have outlasted BMW's.

In their new effort, BMW will more aggressively use the slogan turned brand essence statement to promote the entire line versus focusing on individual models. Few automakers do this, however, BMW has built the kind of relationship with loyalists such that they (I believe) choose the brand first the model second. For example, if you are looking for an SUV you would not look across competitive brands first, you would see what BMW (your preferred brand) has to offer to meet your needs. This is a unique relationship consumers have with an auto brand and now one BMW is smart enough to capitalize on better than they have in the past. BMW clubs and magazines tout the thousands of families and individuals that ONLY own BMW products on a regular basis. Even though this is consistent with BMW's marketing effort, it is one that is grass roots and handled by car owners directly and not the manufacturer.

BMW is likely also tightening up their connection with loyalists now because Audi has been very aggressive and successful in stepping into the BMW sports performance luxury car arena in the past few years. BMW potential buyers who might not be loyalists have found Audi a good choice (not as many on the road, a bit of a better value and awesome new styling that speaks performance).

Watching out for you everyday.

Eli

 

 

Sears Holdings to close 120 or more Sears and Kmart stores

It should come as no surprise to anyone who shops brick and mortar stores these days that Sears Holding the parent to Sears and Kmart is planning to close 120 or more stores around the US.

Most retail competitors did fairly well this year and particularly this holiday season. Why did Sears not enjoy the same benefits of consumers going out and spending?

Simple.

Sears has no brand identity and hasn't for many years. Yours truly has written numerous times that Sears is a retail brand dinosaur that should close up and die. The brand hasn't had a positioning of note since maybe the "softer side of Sears" over a decade or more ago that helped consumers understand they were also sellers of soft goods (apparel) besides hard goods, (tools).

Sears used to be the catch all retailer one could go to, to get anything (besides food) you needed. It was America's store. They sold virtually everything. As WalMart exploded as the mega retailer of the past decade and retailing in general became more defined and brand specific, Sears lost its way. It isn't known for good pricing, service or selection or unique goods (that are consistent with its mid-America brand--Kardashian products make absolutely NO sense at Sears but don't get me started about that emperor's new clothes business). Sears exists because of inertia not because of any reason to exist and that is why I expect the brand to be out of business within two years or less. Sears is just completely out of step with the world in which we live today. Period.

Watching out for you everyday.

Eli

 

Martha Stewart partners with J. C. Penney to expand brand and help shore up weak sales at retailer

Martha Stewart proves if your brand is targeted right and the core brand essence is compelling enough it can appeal to a broad spectrum of Americans across socio-economic levels.

Stewart is partnering this time with J. C. Penney for the development of mini Martha Stewart boutiques inside the lagging retailer's stores nationwide. Penney has taken nearly a 17% stake in Martha Stewart's public company. For Penney's CEO Ron Johnson sees this co-branded venture as a way to increase the retailers exposure and importance as he tries to get the company back on its feet. Penney's is doing poorly relative to Macys and other traditional department store entities. Johnson recently took over the helm of Penney's after notable tentures at both Target and Apple where he developed the wildly successful Apple retail concept.

Stewart will provide new exclusive products for her shop in shop concept that will not directly compete with her current products sold at Macys, Home Depot and PetSmart. Staffers will be exclusive to Stewart's mini stores to ensure the brand message stays on target.

Although Stewart's empire has taken a big hit in the past few years because it is so advertising dependant (her magazine is a big part of her empire), her alliances continue to prove she has staying power and remains one of the iconic brands of the past several decades especially given her stint away from the business for illegal stock transactions followed by jail time.

Watching out for you everyday.

Eli

Free shipping becomes commodity offering vs benefit for holiday shoppers

For the past number of years, many millions of consumers had chosen to buy online vs in brick and mortar retail (Including on Black Friday) because of two reasons. First, no sales tax (in most states). Second, free shipping. Not all online sites had offered free shipping in the past. It might have required a minimum expenditure of say $50 but it did entice people to shop one place versus another.

This year it appears that "Free Shipping" has become a commodity offering. This means that it is offered by a much larger number of online only retailers and is being matched by many brick and mortar retailers on their online sites. It has in marketing parlance become "a price of entry" into the online shopping game. You have to offer it to survive and compete.

This is very good for consumers but could pose financial problems for retailers. Shipping costs are not inexpensive for retailers to absorb and could hurt profitability numbers at the end of the holiday season when all is tabulated.

One online retailer that appeals to young urban hipster types, Karmaloop.com, throws "free shipping" and percentage discounts out to its loyal buyers pretty frequently all year long. However, when you click through to final payment terms on your purchase you find they charge a $1.50 "handling" fee and don't see that has a shipping charge. I have expressed to the CEO that I feel this is a bit disceptive to consumers. The company's response has been they need to offset the huge costs of free shipping and this is how their bean counters told them to do it. Bad idea.

Personally, I have become a heavy Amazon.com shopper because of free shipping and very low cost two day and overnight shipping options as a "prime" member, (which costs $79 a year and is worth it in my opinion). I also have found from the comfort of my beach side lounge chair better deals on Amazon then some advertised Black Friday offerings at brick and mortar stores with the added bonus of no sales tax and no shipping fees. Pretty hard to beat without facing the vicious Black Friday crowds.

Watching out for you everyday.

Eli

 

LA Times "brand" story on Kardashian brand has follow up.

Here is the link to the follow up piece by writer Adam Tschorn. He explores my point of view.

Kardashian a Brand?

 

Watching out for you everday.

Eli

Black Friday moves to Turkey Day, Thanksgiving but will consumers respond positively to this move?

Getting a jump on Black Friday retail sales has become an obsession for millions of Americans. In the past few years most electronic and mass merchandiser retail concerns have opened their doors in the wee hours of the Friday after Thanksgiving. Some open at Midnight to lure shoppers to (supposedly) great bargains. Consumers have been seen lining up for hours to get into these special shopping events. But there maybe a backlash this holiday season.

This year a handful of retailers are pushing the time frame even earlier announcing they will open at 10pm on Thanksgiving. Some consumers think this is great news. However, a growing number are publicly saying they think stores opening in the evening of Thanksgiving Day is "crossing the line".

The line being crossed is the one which says making employees shorten their holiday family time to come to work is unfair, unreasonable and at one extreme a violation of workers rights. In many news articles over the past few days, thousands of consumers have expressed concern to full blown outrage that greedy retailers are forcing their employees (even with holiday pay) to give up time with family to work. Is this going to far? Are these outraged consumers right? Will retailers who open "too early" see a negative feedback in their sales? It is too early to tell but things are a brewing.

The "Occupy" rallies around the US have shown many Americans are fed up with corporate greed and the needs of the wealthy to make more and more money off the backs of the average guy. It is within this cultural paradigm shift that such a backlash against retailers forcing workers to work on holidays is getting much of its fuel.

It is a tricky line to cross because many retailers feel they must be competitive and lure shoppers in as quickly as possible to "snap up" the available holiday gift buying dollars especially in this on-going weak economy. Those retailers who will not open on Thanksgiving evening have expressed support for workers and their families but also acknowedge it could be a costly risk to lose valuable consumer sales.

Personally I cannot imagine being a part of this craziness and have found many of the same desirable items available from the comfort of one's home office online at comparable prices. But what is important here is the underlying voice of average Americans which has until the "Occupy" rallies been kind of quiet. I think it is very important for consumer products and service companies to be mindful of this increasingly vocal group and not to dismiss it as unimportant or minor in anyway. There will be changes in our culture that come out of this still undefined movement across the US. As of yet, as always when you are in the middle of a paradigm shift, it is unclear what kind or what magnitude of change will be forthcoming. Be rest assured, however, that an important shift is coming.

Watching out for you everyday.

Eli

Consumer darling JetBlue brand suffers due to stranded planes in freak NE snowstorm.

JetBlue apparently faced some major obstacles dealing with the freak October Northeast snow storm this past weekend. In one case in which a plane was stranded on the tarmac at Bradley International in Connecticut for seven hours, it might turn out to be less of the brand's fault and more of the airport.

This past year a Passenger Bill of Rights was passed by Congress to ensure these kinds of incidents where passengers are stuck on planes for ridiculously long hours without food, water or bathrooms would be addressed. The fines the airlines face are as much as nearly $28,000 per passenger for each incident. Hefty to say the least.

Now I am no fan of airline travel these days nor the lack of service most airlines offer a sentiment shared by millions of people around the globe. However, if the latest news is true that Bradley International Airport is mostly at fault, then why should the airlines suffer millions of dollars in fines? What has surfaced includes the JetBlue Pilot's unanswered pleas to the airport to help get passengers off the plane after finding his company could not get the airport to help either. The airport was very slow to react seemingly with little or no emergency preparedness plan in place.

Maybe if the airline turns out NOT to be at fault and it is the fault of the airport and the city and/or state can they all be fined? Could the city and state be subject to lawsuits from passengers? Why not? Airports (run by governments) get fees from airlines to do business so they need to be held accountable, although, as we all know Government, whether local, city, state or Federal seem to not be accountable for much lately.

Until all the facts are known, JetBlue will be taking alot of heat from angry passengers and the media.

Watching out for you everyday.

Eli

 

Bank of America likely to pull a "Netflix": About face based on consumer anger

Looks like Bank of America is learning that you cannot keep pissing off your customers and nickel and diming them and think you can keep them loyal. In a move pundits are calling a "Netflix", B of A is expected to change a recent decision and drop its intent to charge customers for ATM/Debit Card use. Several other banks (who did not get the same flack as B of A) have already dropped the idea.

Companies have to realize in the world we occupy today, information, especially consumer dissatisfaction news spreads like wildfire in minutes not days or weeks. Companies are trying so hard to manipulate social media to generate business and open dialogues with consumers but seem to forget that these same tools can damage and possibly destroy a business easily and quickly.

The bad news is be sure B of A will find another way to levy more fees on its consumers. This is why millions of people are switching to Credit Unions for banking services where fees are low or non-existent and the service is far better and more helpful than at traditional banks.

Watching out for you everyday.

Eli